I was just playing...

edited January 2011 in End User
Hi Nard,

There I was just playing with some reports and thought to myself,
'self'. 'Would the report be anymore efficient if I didn't have all the
table's fields in the table fields for the report?'

So I looked at the report I was playing with, includes a sub-report,
and pondered what fields to 'drop'.

It then occurred to me that it would be really great if the 'Fields for
Invoices', in my case' had an indicator against the fields that were
actually used in the report itself.

I mean. How hard can it be? Right?

1. Is there any efficiency/performance benefit in ONLY having the
fields actually used in the report, in the reports table fields?

2. Can a 'check' mark or similar be added against those fields actually
used in the report?

Just some thoughts to myself....:-)



  • edited January 2011
    Hi Ian,

    This would be a function of the database you are accessing. Theoretically,
    if fewer fields are selected, the query will process faster but this is
    something you would need to try. In reality, the performance increase may
    be negligible.

    If I understand correctly you would like the ability to toggle the
    visibility of a field from within DADE like you can with the DataPipeline.
    We will consider this for a later release of ReportBuilder. Thanks for your


    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    Best Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
  • edited January 2011
    This is a multipart message in MIME format
  • edited January 2011
    Hi Nico,

    Apologies for the incorrect name.

This discussion has been closed.